fabulous work on Peter Cushing there! Christopher Lee isn't quite as successful but very good nonetheless! Excellent shading and clarity of line. I don't know who the other dude is, but he's certainly creeping me out.
I think that with Peter Cushing you've captured enough of the likeness that it's recognisably him, but also the proportions are better with the perspective and all, so it's a more "complete" image than Lee, where I can see where you were going, but you got so close that we reach uncanny valley - I notice the imperfections more, perhaps, because the features are much more defined. I think. Anyway. Enough of me going on and on aw man, I just saw your Frankenstein. Awesome.
Well, that's good to know, because I always thought I kind of goofed on Cushing. But to be even more honest, I think my rendering of Neame is the least successful of the three.
But then again, this was pretty much a quickie- sketched it all out with ballpoint pen in a friend's sketchbook. Right after I finished it, I noticed that Lee's forehead was too large! LOL
Great studies of the cast.
And I really must thank you for watching and for all the faves. Much appreciated!
[link]
The other guy is a character known as Johnny Alucard, played by Christopher Neame in this movie.
Thanks for your comments! I appreciate it!
But then again, this was pretty much a quickie- sketched it all out with ballpoint pen in a friend's sketchbook. Right after I finished it, I noticed that Lee's forehead was too large! LOL
Ah, I'm glad you like my Frankenstein!